Screener
TMAT vs AUMI
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Themes Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- AUMI costs 0.47% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than AUMI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while AUMI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; AUMI uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | AUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $30M |
| Since | 2021 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.6% | +65.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.16% | 47.96% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -31.88% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and AUMI
Explore further