Screener
TMAT vs RING
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.43% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than TMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while RING is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; RING uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RING has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | RING | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2021 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 0.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.6% | +77.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.7% | +46.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | +19.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.16% | 46.02% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -52.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and RING
Explore further