Screener
TMAT vs BAI
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF
Key differences
- BAI costs 0.27% less per year.
- BAI is significantly larger than TMAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while BAI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT covers north america markets; BAI covers global.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; BAI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | BAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $13.4B |
| Since | 2021 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | 1.39% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.6% | +98.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.16% | 32.44% |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -34.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and BAI
Explore further