Screener
TMAT vs ENHI
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs iShares Enhanced International Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.55% less per year.
- TMAT is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; ENHI uses active selection.
- TMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | ENHI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $11M |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -5.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and ENHI
Explore further