Screener
TMAT vs BFLX
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.42% less per year.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while BFLX is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; BFLX uses active selection.
- TMAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | — |
| Since | 2021 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.91% | — |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and BFLX
Explore further