Screener
TMAT vs RGLO
Main Thematic Innovation ETF vs Russell Investments Global Equity ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.33% less per year.
- TMAT is classified as alternative, while RGLO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- TMAT follows a option income strategy; RGLO uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMAT | RGLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.82% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $211M | $309M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.02% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +41.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.92 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.16% | — |
| Max drawdown | -58.55% | -9.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMAT and RGLO
Explore further