Screener
TMED vs IHF
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF vs iShares U.S. Healthcare Providers ETF
Key differences
- IHF costs 0.06% less per year.
- IHF is significantly larger than TMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMED covers global markets; IHF covers north america.
- TMED follows a active selection strategy; IHF uses index tracking.
- IHF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMED | IHF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $777M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.11% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +10.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.54% |
| Max drawdown | -11.11% | -35.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMED and IHF
Explore further