Screener
TMED vs IXJ
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF vs iShares Global Healthcare ETF
Key differences
- IXJ is significantly larger than TMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMED follows a active selection strategy; IXJ uses index tracking.
- IXJ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMED | IXJ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $3.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +4.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.46% |
| Max drawdown | -11.11% | -27.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMED and IXJ
Explore further