Screener
TMED vs XLV
T. Rowe Price Health Care ETF vs State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR ETF
Key differences
- XLV costs 0.36% less per year.
- XLV is significantly larger than TMED — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMED covers global markets; XLV covers north america.
- TMED follows a active selection strategy; XLV uses index tracking.
- XLV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMED | XLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.44% | 0.08% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $37.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.56% |
| Max drawdown | -11.11% | -28.40% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMED and XLV
Explore further