Screener
TMFC vs FDRS
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- TMFC is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFC is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TMFC follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- TMFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $77M |
| Since | 2018 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | — |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and FDRS
Explore further