Screener
TMFC vs IWL
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 0.35% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2018 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and IWL
Explore further