Screener
TMFC vs SMMD
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs iShares Russell 2500 ETF
Key differences
- SMMD costs 0.35% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | SMMD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $3.0B |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +36.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +18.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.81 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 17.24% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -41.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and SMMD
Explore further