Screener
TMFC vs TMFS
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- TMFC costs 0.35% less per year.
- TMFC is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFC follows a index tracking strategy; TMFS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFC | TMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.85% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $64M |
| Since | 2018 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.14% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.7% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.4% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.5% | -0.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.31 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.72% | 19.56% |
| Max drawdown | -33.06% | -48.79% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFC and TMFS
Explore further