Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TMFE vs BFOR

Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF vs Barron's 400 ETF

TMFE

Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF

Motley Fool

Annual cost

0.50%

Fund size

$84M

BFOR

Barron's 400 ETF

ALPS

Annual cost

0.65%

Fund size

$211M

Key differences

  • TMFE costs 0.15% less per year.
  • BFOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TMFEBFOR
Annual cost (TER)0.50%0.65%
Fund size (AUM)$84M$211M
Since20212013
Dividend yield0.32%0.55%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+11.2%+24.5%
CAGR 3Y+20.6%+20.2%
CAGR 5YN/A+10.5%
Sharpe 3Y1.050.95
Volatility 1Y12.20%14.96%
Max drawdown-31.07%-41.27%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TMFE and BFOR