Screener
TMFE vs CGUS
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.17% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than TMFE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFE follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, CGUS has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFE | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $84M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.2% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.24% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -31.07% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFE and CGUS
Explore further