Screener
TMFE vs KONG
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF vs Formidable Fortress ETF
Key differences
- TMFE costs 0.39% less per year.
- TMFE is significantly larger than KONG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFE is classified as equity, while KONG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- TMFE follows a index tracking strategy; KONG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, TMFE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFE | KONG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.89% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $84M | $22M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.2% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +9.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.24% | 10.91% |
| Max drawdown | -31.07% | -19.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFE and KONG
Explore further