Screener
TMFE vs SCOW
Motley Fool Capital Efficiency 100 Index ETF vs Pacer S&P SmallCap 600 Quality FCF Aristocrats ETF
Key differences
- TMFE costs 0.09% less per year.
- TMFE is significantly larger than SCOW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFE | SCOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $84M | $2M |
| Since | 2021 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +10.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.24% | — |
| Max drawdown | -31.07% | -10.09% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFE and SCOW
Explore further