Screener
TMFM vs FAB
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FAB costs 0.19% less per year.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; FAB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FAB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | FAB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $139M |
| Since | 2014 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.4% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.1% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.06 | 0.74 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 14.02% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -47.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and FAB
Explore further