Screener
TMFM vs FAD
Motley Fool Mid-Cap Growth ETF vs First Trust Multi Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
Key differences
- FAD costs 0.22% less per year.
- FAD is significantly larger than TMFM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFM follows a active selection strategy; FAD uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FAD has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FAD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFM | FAD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.63% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $117M | $480M |
| Since | 2014 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -19.4% | +34.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.1% | +24.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.06 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.99% | 18.41% |
| Max drawdown | -31.75% | -37.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFM and FAD
Explore further