Screener
TMFS vs FBCG
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
Key differences
- FBCG costs 0.28% less per year.
- FBCG is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS covers north america markets; FBCG covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, FBCG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | FBCG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.57% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.1% | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +32.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.9% | +16.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.64% | 18.65% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -43.56% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and FBCG
Explore further