Screener
TMFS vs SLYG
Motley Fool Small-Cap Growth ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- SLYG costs 0.70% less per year.
- SLYG is significantly larger than TMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TMFS follows a active selection strategy; SLYG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, SLYG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SLYG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TMFS | SLYG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.85% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $64M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2018 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +0.1% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +7.2% | +16.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -0.9% | +6.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.27 | 0.67 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.64% | 17.72% |
| Max drawdown | -48.79% | -41.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TMFS and SLYG
Explore further