Screener
TNA vs SPDN
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares
Key differences
- SPDN costs 0.57% less per year.
- TNA is significantly larger than SPDN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TNA follows a leveraged strategy; SPDN uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, TNA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- TNA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TNA | SPDN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.05% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $219M |
| Since | 2008 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 3.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +130.8% | -18.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +30.7% | -13.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.2% | -9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | -1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.15% | 12.30% |
| Max drawdown | -88.09% | -75.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TNA and SPDN
Explore further