Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TRFM vs QTAC

AAM Transformers ETF vs Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF

TRFM

AAM Transformers ETF

Annual cost

0.49%

Fund size

$213M

QTAC

Q3 All-Season Tactical Advantage ETF

Annual cost

1.78%

Fund size

$59M

Key differences

TRFM is an equity ETF, while QTAC is an alternative ETF. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and QTAC 1.78%.

  • TRFM is an equity fund, while QTAC is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; QTAC uses multi strategy.
  • TRFM costs 1.29% less per year.
  • TRFM is much larger than QTAC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

TRFMQTAC
Annual cost (TER)0.49%1.78%
Fund size (AUM)$213M$59M
Since20222025
Dividend yield0.13%
Asset classequityalternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingmulti strategy
CAGR 1Y+42.5%N/A
CAGR 3Y+29.6%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.03N/A
Volatility 1Y23.37%
Max drawdown-28.40%-16.56%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to TRFM and QTAC