Screener
TRFM vs SECT
AAM Transformers ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Key differences
Both TRFM and SECT are equity ETFs. TRFM charges 0.49% a year and SECT 0.69%. The main difference: TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; SECT uses active selection.
- TRFM follows a index tracking strategy; SECT uses active selection.
- TRFM costs 0.20% less per year.
- SECT is much larger than TRFM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, TRFM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SECT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRFM | SECT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $213M | $2.8B |
| Since | 2022 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.13% | 0.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.5% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.6% | +19.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.03 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.37% | 13.46% |
| Max drawdown | -28.40% | -38.09% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.