Screener
TRUT vs BBH
Vaneck Technology Trusector ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- TRUT costs 0.21% less per year.
- BBH is significantly larger than TRUT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TRUT follows a active selection strategy; BBH uses index tracking.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TRUT | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.14% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $113M | $365M |
| Since | 2025 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -18.55% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TRUT and BBH
Explore further