Screener
TTT vs SKF
ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury vs ProShares UltraShort Financials
Key differences
TTT is a fixed income ETF, while SKF is an equity ETF. TTT charges 0.95% a year and SKF 0.95%.
- TTT is a fixed income fund, while SKF is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- TTT follows a leveraged strategy; SKF uses inverse.
- Over the last three years, TTT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SKF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TTT | SKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $19M | $15M |
| Since | 2012 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 8.74% | 4.20% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | -4.3% | -7.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +8.4% | -26.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +16.8% | -16.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.32 | -0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 28.96% | 29.37% |
| Max drawdown | -81.76% | -96.51% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.