Screener
TUA vs FLGV
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs Franklin U.S. Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- FLGV costs 0.16% less per year.
- TUA is classified as alternative, while FLGV is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TUA follows a active selection strategy; FLGV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, FLGV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | FLGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $802M | $998M |
| Since | 2022 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 4.11% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.8% | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.2% | +2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.58 | -0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.85% | 3.79% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -17.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUA and FLGV
Explore further