Screener
TUA vs LMBS
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs First Trust Low Duration Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- TUA costs 0.41% less per year.
- LMBS is significantly larger than TUA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUA is classified as alternative, while LMBS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TUA follows a active selection strategy; LMBS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LMBS has delivered higher annualized returns.
- LMBS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | LMBS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.66% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $802M | $6.2B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 4.09% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.3% | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -1.5% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.50 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.89% | 1.98% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -6.48% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUA and LMBS
Explore further