Screener
TUA vs SCHQ
Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF vs Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
Key differences
- SCHQ costs 0.22% less per year.
- TUA is classified as alternative, while SCHQ is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TUA follows a active selection strategy; SCHQ uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUA | SCHQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $802M | $897M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 3.63% | 4.76% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -1.8% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -2.2% | -1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -5.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.58 | -0.31 |
| Volatility 1Y | 6.85% | 9.07% |
| Max drawdown | -15.85% | -46.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUA and SCHQ
Explore further