Screener
TUG vs FBND
STF Tactical Growth ETF vs Fidelity Total Bond ETF
Key differences
- FBND costs 0.29% less per year.
- FBND is significantly larger than TUG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUG is classified as mixed asset, while FBND is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- TUG covers north america markets; FBND covers global.
- TUG follows a active selection strategy; FBND uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, TUG has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FBND has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUG | FBND | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.36% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $25.6B |
| Since | 2022 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.58% | 4.70% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.4% | +6.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.5% | +4.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.06 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.15% | 3.90% |
| Max drawdown | -22.27% | -17.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUG and FBND
Explore further