Screener
TUGN vs BSR
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs Pacific Select Fund
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.44% less per year.
- TUGN is classified as alternative, while BSR is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; BSR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | BSR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 1.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $39M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 11.46% | 1.02% |
| Asset class | alternative | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.8% | +12.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 8.71% |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -15.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUGN and BSR
Explore further