Screener
TUGN vs QQH
STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF vs HCM Defender 100 Index ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.33% less per year.
- QQH is significantly larger than TUGN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TUGN follows a option income strategy; QQH uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, QQH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| TUGN | QQH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.98% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $78M | $697M |
| Since | 2022 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 11.46% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.8% | +39.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.2% | +27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.10 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.35% | 20.79% |
| Max drawdown | -23.45% | -41.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TUGN and QQH
Explore further