Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TYLG vs QYLD

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

TYLG

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$13M

QYLD

Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$8.3B

Key differences

  • QYLD is significantly larger than TYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, TYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • QYLD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

TYLGQYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$13M$8.3B
Since20222013
Dividend yield8.06%11.47%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+44.2%+24.7%
CAGR 3Y+24.6%+14.1%
CAGR 5YN/A+8.8%
Sharpe 3Y1.040.81
Volatility 1Y15.45%8.72%
Max drawdown-24.00%-24.75%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TYLG and QYLD