Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

TYLG vs RYLD

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

TYLG

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$13M

RYLD

Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.60%

Fund size

$1.3B

Key differences

  • RYLD is significantly larger than TYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, TYLG has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

TYLGRYLD
Annual cost (TER)0.60%0.60%
Fund size (AUM)$13M$1.3B
Since20222019
Dividend yield8.06%11.85%
Asset classalternativealternative
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeoption income
CAGR 1Y+47.9%+24.2%
CAGR 3Y+24.7%+8.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+3.3%
Sharpe 3Y1.050.39
Volatility 1Y15.52%10.84%
Max drawdown-24.00%-41.52%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to TYLG and RYLD