Screener
TZA vs AMUU
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares vs Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
Key differences
- TZA costs 0.07% less per year.
- TZA is significantly larger than AMUU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- TZA follows a inverse strategy; AMUU uses leveraged.
- TZA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| TZA | AMUU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $270M | $77M |
| Since | 2008 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.33% | 6.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -67.4% | +953.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -30.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.70 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 57.16% | 128.91% |
| Max drawdown | -99.70% | -56.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to TZA and AMUU
Explore further