Screener
UFO vs ARKF
Procure Space ETF vs ARK Blockchain & Fintech Innovation ETF
Key differences
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; ARKF uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | ARKF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $828M |
| Since | 2019 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +1.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | +30.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | -2.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 33.17% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -78.63% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and ARKF
Explore further