Screener
UFO vs ARKQ
Procure Space ETF vs ARK Autonomous Technology & Robotics ETF
Key differences
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; ARKQ uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- ARKQ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | ARKQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.24% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +79.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | +42.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +13.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 1.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 32.45% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -59.89% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and ARKQ
Explore further