Screener
UFO vs CCOR
Procure Space ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- UFO costs 0.54% less per year.
- UFO is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UFO is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $28M |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and CCOR
Explore further