Screener
UFO vs FDRS
Procure Space ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.26% less per year.
- UFO is significantly larger than FDRS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UFO is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- UFO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $77M |
| Since | 2019 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and FDRS
Explore further