Screener
UFO vs CGGO
Procure Space ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.28% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than UFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UFO covers north america markets; CGGO covers global.
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and CGGO
Explore further