Screener
UFO vs CGGR
Procure Space ETF vs Capital Group Growth ETF
Key differences
- CGGR costs 0.36% less per year.
- CGGR is significantly larger than UFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UFO covers north america markets; CGGR covers global.
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; CGGR uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | CGGR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $22.2B |
| Since | 2019 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +26.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | +26.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 16.35% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -28.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and CGGR
Explore further