Screener
UFO vs EMPB
Procure Space ETF vs Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF
Key differences
- UFO costs 1.46% less per year.
- UFO is significantly larger than EMPB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UFO is classified as equity, while EMPB is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; EMPB uses active selection.
- UFO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | EMPB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 2.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $18M |
| Since | 2019 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +20.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 11.39% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -7.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and EMPB
Explore further