Screener
UFO vs IWR
Procure Space ETF vs iShares Russell Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IWR costs 0.57% less per year.
- IWR is significantly larger than UFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | IWR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $52.6B |
| Since | 2019 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.19% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +23.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | +17.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +8.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 13.52% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -40.59% |
Similar to UFO and IWR
Explore further