Screener
UFO vs MARS
Procure Space ETF vs Roundhill Space & Technology ETF
Key differences
- UFO is significantly larger than MARS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UFO follows a index tracking strategy; MARS uses active selection.
- UFO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | MARS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $29M |
| Since | 2019 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | — |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -13.96% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and MARS
Explore further