Screener
UFO vs SCHK
Procure Space ETF vs Schwab 1000 ETF
Key differences
- SCHK costs 0.72% less per year.
- SCHK is significantly larger than UFO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, UFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UFO | SCHK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $749M | $5.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 1.06% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +176.7% | +30.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +54.1% | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +20.6% | +13.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.40 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.94% | 12.30% |
| Max drawdown | -50.33% | -34.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UFO and SCHK
Explore further