Screener
ULE vs EFZ
ProShares Ultra Euro vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- ULE is classified as currency, while EFZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ULE follows a leveraged strategy; EFZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, ULE has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULE | EFZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.98% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $16M |
| Since | 2008 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 3.97% |
| Asset class | currency | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.1% | -15.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.9% | -9.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.8% | -6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | -0.79 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.75% | 16.44% |
| Max drawdown | -51.30% | -61.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULE and EFZ
Explore further