Screener
ULVM vs IFLO
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF vs VictoryShares International Free Cash Flow ETF
Key differences
- ULVM costs 0.36% less per year.
- ULVM covers north america markets; IFLO covers global.
- ULVM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ULVM | IFLO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.56% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $168M |
| Since | 2017 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.63% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.17 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.88% | — |
| Max drawdown | -40.71% | -6.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ULVM and IFLO
Explore further