Screener
UNL vs UNG
United States 12 Month Natural Gas Fund, LP vs United States Natural Gas Fund, LP
Key differences
- UNG costs 0.48% less per year.
- UNG is significantly larger than UNL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, UNL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UNL | UNG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.65% | 1.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $533M |
| Since | 2009 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | commodity | commodity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | — | — |
| CAGR 1Y | -31.0% | -33.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | -18.7% | -27.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.1% | -23.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.54 | -0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 35.98% | 60.76% |
| Max drawdown | -78.12% | -93.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UNL and UNG
Explore further