Screener
UPGR vs CGW
Xtrackers US Green Infrastructure Select Equity ETF vs Invesco S&P Global Water Index ETF
Key differences
- UPGR costs 0.23% less per year.
- CGW is significantly larger than UPGR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- CGW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| UPGR | CGW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2023 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +70.0% | +5.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.49 |
| Volatility 1Y | 30.14% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -46.60% | -35.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UPGR and CGW
Explore further