Screener
URA vs COPX
Global X Uranium ETF vs Global X Copper Miners ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, URA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| URA | COPX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $7.4B |
| Since | 2010 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.75% | 2.43% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.1% | +114.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +41.8% | +35.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +23.3% | +18.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.96 | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | 49.70% | 41.00% |
| Max drawdown | -61.45% | -65.41% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to URA and COPX
Explore further